LEVEL OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN LAKSANA TOURISM VILLAGE, IBUN DISTRICT, BANDUNG REGENCY, WEST JAVA, INDONESIA
Abstract
Laksana Tourism Village has the potential to become a better tourist destination. The situation shows that the management of community-based tourism villages is not good enough. This study aims to determine the level of community participation. This study uses a quantitative approach with survey techniques. The object analyzed is the community involved in tourism activities. The data analyzed are the results of interviews, questionnaires, literature studies, and field documentation. Research data were analyzed using descriptive statistics with a Likert scale. The results of this study are that community participation in the Tourism Village at the planning stage is still dominated by external parties and certain groups of people, at the implementation stage it involves almost the entire community, the utilization stage of the results shows there is a clear profit sharing but not yet transparent report, and at the evaluation stage there is no continuous evaluation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bandung District Regulation No. 4 of 2019, (2019).
Bandung Regent Decree number 556.42/Kop.71-Dispopar/2011, (2011).
BPS. (2019). Statistics West Java 2019.
Dewi, M. H. (2013). Development of Tourism Villages Based on Local Community Participation in Jatiluwih Tourism Village, Tabanan, Bali. Kawistara Journal, 3(2), 117–226.
District Government Bandung. (2011). Defined 10 Tourism Villages. Bandung Regency Government. http://www.bandungkab.go.id/arsip/ set-1 villagetourism
Dwiningrum. (2016). Management Conflict between Managers and Communities in Tahura Juanda. JUMPA, 2(2), 111–123.
Gulo, W. (2002). Research Methodology. Grasindo.
Halim, H. (2017). The Worst Tourist Drop in Bandung. Media Pikiran Rakyat. www.pikiranrakyat.com/jawa barat/
Haryanto, T. J. (2014). Ecotourism Development Model in Supporting Regional Economic Independence (Case Study of DIY Province). Kawistara.
Mikkelsen, B. (2003). Participatory research method and empowerment efforts. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Nur, I. (2018). Implications of Tourism Village Development for Improving the Economy of Local Communities (Study in Pao Village). National Seminar and Call for Paper Management, Accounting and Banking.
Oktami, S., & Arief. (2018). Community Participation in th Development of Ecotourism in the Great Forest park Ir. H. Juanda. Media Konservasi, 23(3).
Prodjo, W. (2019). Kamojang Crater Area was made a Special Location for Healthy Tourism Regions. Tribun Jawa Barat. https://jabar.tribunnews.com/2019/08/13/
Rachmat, M. (2011). The History of Kamojang. Indonesia Power.
Rahmatina, D. (2010). Procedure Using Stratified Random Sampling Method in Estimating Population Parameters. JEMI Articles, 1(1).
Riduwan. (2002). Measurement Scale of Research Variables. Alfabeta.
Santika, E. (2017). Community Participation and Tourism Village Development in Jambak, Semarang Regency. Scientific Artiicles Universitas Kristen Satya Kencana.
Sugiyono. (2012). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Alfabeta.
Sulistiyorini, N. R., Darwis, R. S., & Gutama, A. S. (2015). Community participation in waste management in the Margaluyu Environment of Cicurug Village. SHARE: Social Work Journal, 5(1).
Sunaryo, B. (2013). Development Policy for Tourism Destination Concepts and Its Applications in Indonesia. Gava Media.
Sutiarso, M. A. (n.d.). Development of Sustainable Tourism through Ecotourism. LPBB Mitra Persada.
Umar, H. (2005). Research Methods for Consumer Behavior Services. Ghalia Indonesia.
Uphoff, N. T. (1979). Feasibility and application of rural development participation.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22334/jbhost.v6i1.185
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Serly Anjelia, Endah Djuwendah, Elly Rasmikayati, Hepi Hapsari
License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Visited Number: JBHOST Stats