ANALYSIS OF FEASIBILITY OF PARK KUMBASARI AS ATTRACTION FRIENDLY TOURISM TO TOURISTS
Abstract
In the present era should be an attraction of tourism can be reached and friendly to all people of both senior tourist and junior tourists. Kumbasari Park is one of the tourist attractions in the city that has been styled and constructed by the Government of Denpasar to become a new tourist attraction. However, the Kumbasari Park has not been fully accessible to all tourists. The purpose of this research is to identify, analyze eligibility and find the perception of travellers to facilities and infrastructure of the Kumbasari Park as a tourist attraction. This research includes exploratory research with data collection techniques i.e. observation, and questionnaires. Data analysis techniques are done in a qualitative and quantitative descriptive. From the results of the study can be concluded that, as a whole Taman kumbasari already worth visiting by all the tourists, there are some categories especially accessibility and amenities that are not yet fully friendly to tourists. The development and reordering of facilities and infrastructure should be done in Kumbasari Park to provide comfort and security to all travelers.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anggayana, I. W. A., & Sari, N. L. K. J. P. (2018). Kemampuan Berbicara Bahasa Inggris Mahasiswa Akomodasi Perhotelan: sebuah Kajian Fonologi. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Hotel, 1(1), 8-14
Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Badung. (2016). Data Kunjungan Wisman ke Taman Ayun Kategori Dewasa: BPS Badung
Bagiastra, Ketut. (2016). Hygiene dan Sanitasi WC Umum di Kawasan Objek Wisata Lombok. Jurnal Media Bina Ilmiah, 10(7).
Cooper, et al. (2005). Tourism Priciples and Practice. Essex:Pearson Education Limited
Fandeli, Chafid. 1995. Dasar-dasar Manajemen Kepariwisataan Alam. Liberty.Yogyakarta
Geerts, W. (2018). Top 100 City Destinations 2018. Euromonitor International.
Lawton, M.P. (1993). Meanings of activity. In: Kelly, J.R. ed. Activity and aging. Sage, Newbury Park, California.
Millman, A. (2002). The impact of participation in activities while on vacation on seniors’ psychological well-being: a path model analysis. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research 26.
Ismayanti. (2010). Pengantar Pariwisata.Jakarta: PT. Grasindo
Nieamah, Kartika, F. (2014). Persepsi Wisatawan Mancanegara Terhadap Fasilitas dan Pelayanan di Candi Prambanan. Jurnal Nasional Pariwisata UGM, 6(1), 41
Patterson, Ian. (2006). Growing Older: Tourism and Leisure Behavior of Older Adults. School of Tourism and Leisure Management University of Queensland
Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan RI No. 25 tahun 2016 tentang Rencana Aksi Nasional Kesehatan Lanjut Usia 2016 – 2019. Jakarta
Peraturan Menteri Pariwisata Republik Indonesia No. 1 Tahun 2017 tentang Petunjuk Operasional Pengelolaan Dana Alokasi Khusus Fisik Bidang Pariwisata. Sekretariat Kementerian. Jakarta.
Pitana, I Gede dan Diarta, I Ketut Surya. (2009). Pengantar Ilmu Pariwisata. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Republik Indonesia. (2009).Undang – undang No. 10 tahun 2009 tentang Kepariwisataan. Lembaran Negara RI tahun 2009. Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta.
Soekadijo, R.G. (2003). Anatomi Pariwisata. Jakarta: Penerbit PT Gramedia
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suyitno. (2001). Perencanaan Pariwisata. Yogjakarta: Kanisinus
UNWTO. (2016). Tourism Highlight 2016 Edition.
Utama, I Gusti Bagus Rai. (2012). Trend Perilaku Wisatawan Usia Lanjut Dalam Memilih Aktivitas Wisata. Universitas Udayana.
Widiarta, I Nyoman. (2015). Pengelolaan Daya Tarik Wisata Taman Ayun Sebagai Bagian dari Warisan Budaya Dunia. Universitas Udayana.
Yoeti, Oka. (2008). Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Pariwisata. Jakarta: PT. Pradnya Paramita.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22334/jbhost.v5i2.166
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Visited Number: JBHOST Stats